Sunday, August 25, 2019

Human Capital

I am a UIUC Class of 2017 graduate and former student of ProfArvan’s who took his Fall 2016 Economics of Organizations class. I am writing this guest post to indicate to his current students those aspects of this class and the UIUC Economics major as a whole I have found to be useful as “human capital,” or skills and knowledge possessed by a person that are valuable to others. I will also mention a few skills that I wish I had learned from this class or UIUC before beginning my career.

I was initially attracted to Economics as a field during my Freshman year at UIUC, when my first few Econ classes fascinated me by bringing a systematic, organized viewpoint to something as decidedly unsystematic and disorganized as people. My fascination and curiosity on the matter only grew as undergrad went on, and during my last year of college I decided that I would like to help expand those systems and models that fascinated me by performing academic research in Economics. I’m happy to say that I have the privilege of doing some Economic research in my current position. 

For full disclosure, I tell you that I have only been working in the Econ field for a little over one year, and have been working for the same company that entire time – meaning that, in statistical terms, my “sample size” of the Economics career is small. However, during my first year I moved between two positions: the first was a sales position involving planning and delivering public presentations and demos of my company’s product, which is software that generates economic forecasts according to user-specified assumptions and is intended to be used by both Economists and non-Economists. My current position is in research and development for the company, where I test the forecasting software along with helping to gather,process, and analyze the economic data and estimations that our software is to base its forecasts on. This involves some software programming that is primarily done in Microsoft Excel. While my sample size is small, I hope that in light of my two widely varied positions involving making public presentations, data analysis, and software programming, you might still consider my career experience to be something of a “representative sample” of the Economics career and the types of jobs you might take after graduating.

There are three main things that I learned from ProfArvan’sclass that proved helpful in my first year in the professional world: elementary Excel programming skills (through homework)thoroughly explaining complex concepts and situations (through blog posts), and explaining complex concepts to people in a “high level, quick, and easily grasped manner (through the final project.) While other data analysis tools such as Python and R have become popular, Excel remains a powerful, widely used tool for analyzing data in economics as well as other fields. In particular, ProfArvan’s class functioned as a good introduction to Excel references and formulas, which I use daily on economic data to find growth rates, reformat data into required units, and bring data from different spreadsheets together. Many Economics graduates find jobs that involve doing the same.

Explaining complex concepts as thoroughly as you can in easy-to-understand terms was an important skill when I was in my sales position. I would often break down sample forecasts and the economic terms and data involved to prospective clients such as high-level business executives who hadn’t personally used economics concepts in over a decade or highway engineers who were attempting to see the economic impacts of their proposed project. In fact, many Econ jobs will involve explaining economic ideas to non-Economists. The related skill of summarizing concepts into quick, high level explanations for an audience has been almost as important, because it gave me some early practice for the “elevator” speeches on my company and its product I would be giving to people when cold calling them to invite them to a seminar or a meeting. This is an important skill in the business world in general. 

Regarding the rest of the Economics major, three things that have been helpful as human capital so far have been the required statistics classes, the student presentations required in some classes, and a familiarization with common Macroeconomic vocabulary. Learning about common statistical tests and their implications has made it easier to understand academic Econ research papers. My company’s academic clients use our software on their projects, so some statistical literacy has made it easier for me to talk to prospective clients about work that has been previously done with the software. Some ideas for our forecasts were taken in part from conclusions drawn in academic studies so statistical literacy has also helped me better understand my company’s product. It’s worth noting that it seems to me that many companies that employ Econ graduates, such as economic modeling companies, think tanks, or NGOs, might want new employees to quickly familiarize themselveswith selected academic literature that involves their product or supports their viewpoint.

Because my sales position involved public presentations with an accompanying PowerPoint, having some practice with that during college was helpful. While this may be rather specific to my company, I have also found that the general familiarity with Macroeconomic vocabulary I gained from the required Macroeconomics course sequence (such as knowing what consumption and investments are) provided a helpful foundation for understanding forecasts from my company’s softwareLooking at my own job and the jobs that other Econ graduates have landed, it seems that, while you may not find yourself using most of the complex economic models or theories you learned in college, remembering the basic vocabulary and economic relationships (like that between supply and demand)that it took to understand the complex stuff will be helpful.  

I wish I had learned more Excel skills while at UIUC, since it is, by far, the tool I use most in my current position. A quick lesson on macros, formula auditing, and some of the more complex functions, even just to know those features were there so I would know what to search for when a good use case for them came up, would have been added a lot of value. Macros are helpful for automating highly repetitive tasks, which can come up often when working with large datasets. Formula auditing, which allows the user to trace the formula in a selected cell to its precedents (cells on which the value in the selected cell depends) and dependents (cells that depend on the value of the selected cell) can make checking over large numbers of spreadsheets much easier. 

While I am naturally very nervous when speaking in front of groups, in retrospect I wish the Econ major involved more class presentations – especially presentations that encouraged more spontaneous and improvisational speaking. When I prepared for the few class presentations I had in the Econ major, my typical strategy was to write out a full script, which I would practice and memorize. If allowed, I would have notecards with brief talking points with me during the presentation for reference. This approach would turn out to be impractical for presentations on products as a sales associate, as my coworkers that I would be giving the presentation with would often introduce changes at the last minute that would render parts of my script obsolete. Sometimes my part of a presentation would depend on knowing what a coworker would say during theirs, and they would finish their part of the presentation at close to the last minute. While I knew the product and the general talking points of my presentations well, my psychological dependence on scripts memorized and rehearsed down to the individual word would often make me feel and appear nervous during presentations where even a relatively inconsequential change was made. Shaking this dependence before entering the job world wouldhave saved me trouble later on. For better or for worse, Economics is a field that heavily centers on debate between schools of thoughtmeaning that many jobs involve standing in front of an audience and attempting to convince them that your way of thinking, as opposed to another, is the one they should follow.

While UIUC may not have prepared me for everything I would face in my first year in the professional world, I look at my two points above as the first major aspects to focus on in my post-college professional development. To build my skills in those areas, I regularly read guides on using Excel and attend Toastmasters, a club with chapters around the nation where members practice public speaking using each other as the audience. This brings me to one more piece of human capital I got from my experience with Prof. Arvan and UIUC  a habit of lifelong learning and honing my skills. Econ, like all other fields nowadays, is advancing fast, so no matter what human capital we gained from undergrad, we will have to continually expand our skills to keep up.

3 comments:

  1. Thanks so much for this post. I have a sense that if your initial job is at a company where you didn't do an internship previously, then they use that first job assignment as a screen - to figure out if they should keep you and then, if they do keep you, to figure out what type of work you should be assigned to. I too don't have a large enough sample to go on, but from what I know hearing from some former students, and my own kids do, is that moving between jobs within the same company and doing so fairly early is common. Moving to a different company may be common too.

    If misery loves company, you might be interested to know that when I first came to Illinois, I was very nervous teaching undergraduates in the intermediate micro class. I had no problem this way teaching math econ, at the grad level and at the undergrad level, but intermediate micro was a different story. And it wasn't because I didn't know the subject matter. It was because I wasn't sure how to put the subject matter in a way where the students would get it. (Most seemed not to get it.) It is quite a skill to be able to explain complex economic ideas in a clear way so people get the gist of what is going on. If you've mastered that already, congratulations. It took me about 10 years (and maybe longer) to be able to do that.

    On the learning to program in Excel, I'm pretty out of it now but I'm under the impression that that Econ major demands all students have taken a basic course in Computer Science, (my recollection is that it was CS 105 but that was before they changed the course numbering system). And I thought programming with Excel was a big piece of that course. Things may have changed a lot since. As I told you, I'm largely self-taught with Excel. When I took that CS course, the programming language was Fortran. There were some aspects of Fortran that I continue to use in Excel (the syntax is completely different, of course, but the underlying ideas are basically the same).

    I found your discussion of public speaking interesting. I used to have students make in class presentations, in groups, and I think it works reasonably well in a seminar class. I tried it once in a large class setting and it became unwieldy there. Students clearly do need practice at making presentations, but also in how to conduct a discussion after the presentation is over. I hadn't heard of Toastmasters before. That sounds like a good way to address the problem. My own belief about these things, in retrospect, is that nervousness has an upside. It shows you care about things. If there is no stage fright in advance of a presentation, you may be under prepared. I've also learned something specific to me. If I have notes and go off them, I'll go too fast. I try to recreate on the fly - literally think it through while I'm talking - because that gets the pace of what I have to say better. And I think it also enables questions during the presentation. If a speaker is zipping through a PowerPoint, questions are often held till the presentation concluded. I prefer more give and take right from the get go.

    ReplyDelete
  2. (In Fall 2016, replying to your comments was a course requirement, so I'll do one here as an example.)

    While one of the required statistics courses in the Econ major does teach some very basic Excel skills (you taught us more) there were no required CS courses for the Econ major, at least not for the Class of 2017. There was a CS course similar to what you are talking about, but it was required for Business majors and was not even very well "advertised" in the Econ department as a particularly good course to take. Reinstating the requirement would serve many current Econ students well in the future.

    You do seem to be correct when you say that relying on a script less allows for a more flexible presentation that is open to audience questions and discussion. As I neared the end of my experience in sales, I relied on scripts less and found my presentations to be more natural and reactive to audience feedback.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As another response I have to your comment, I can definitely confirm that moving between companies early in a career, especially for my generation, is practically expected. I know at least two people that have already moved on from their first company one year after graduating college.

      While I would not say that I've mastered explaining economic concepts at this point, I would say that I've definitely improved on it over the past year. One difference I've noticed between academic and "real world" econ is that in academic econ, professors and teachers will regularly relate economic concepts back to math in order to validate those concepts and show the common mathematical "threads" that underlie a good chunk of modern economics. In the "real world," you generally want to avoid getting into math when explaining economic concepts - it's considered better to keep explanations as intuitive as possible, as it's thought that the majority of your non-expert audience would find math "boring."

      Delete